net-progress logo    
 
net-progress logo - click for home page
 

Summary

Our surveys are completely objective, impartial and transparent. Our methodology outlines what checks we make in determining our website ratings.
 
 
 
survey methodology
   
 

Download the methodology in full

website quality

 
website quality methodology
Factor Description Importance
Primary Broken links These are significant and noticeable errors that negatively affect a user’s experience. These errors consist of missing or incorrectly specified links to pages, images, documents, email addresses, other websites and broken anchors. High
Secondary broken links Whilst a ¨no tolerance¨ attitude to errors is recommended, some broken links impact less than others on the quality of visit. Consequently, missing image files that merely help to align the page correctly, and are generally not noticeable to a visitor are not penalised to the same level as primary broken links. Low
Missing page titles A slow website can cause great frustration for a website visitor, and can cause website abandonment. Whilst factors like the speed of the internet and quality of connection are important, so is page size. As some slow pages are necessary if not desirable on any website to show product images, presentations and so on, it is the ratio of slow to fast pages that is measured to provide an overall website speed figure. Medium
Slow home page For the majority of websites, the home page is the biggest single entry point. Failure to load quickly can lead to website abandonment at the first hurdle. A penalty is applied to those websites that have a slow home page. High
Deep Pages A website with pages more than four clicks away from the home page is considered to have ¨deep¨ pages. This can disorientate visitors so that they feel lost on the website. Medium
Poorly Implemented Frames Poorly implemented frames can result in pages being displayed incorrectly, printing issues and becoming disconnected in search engine results. Failure to implement frames correctly receives a penalty. Medium
Generic page titles Page titles help users to orientate themselves within a website. Use of generic titles largely fails to help with this, and so a penalty is applied. Medium
Javascript/Java/Flash Required Websites that require JavaScript, Java or Flash to be active in order to navigate a website or view content receive a penalty, as they exclude user groups that do not support these technologies. High
Privacy policy Users generally want to know if data about them is recorded, and if so, what is done with that data. Failure to have or clearly label a link to a privacy policy statement from the home page receives a penalty. High
 

Methodology

Due to the size of some of some websites, only the first 5,000 URLs are checked where this is applicable. Where organisations have more than one domain, only one has been tested.
A combination of manual checking and automated software is used to identify the number of issues present on a website. Weighting is applied to reflect the relative importance (low, medium or high) of the various issues. The score takes into account the relative size of the website.
 

Explanation of Results

The quality of a website is measured on a scale of 0-100. The higher the score, the better the website quality.
 
Guidelines
Score Rating Description
76 + Excellent Likely to provide an excellent visitor experience.
66 - 75 Good Likely to provide a good visitor experience.
56 - 65 Fair Likely to provide a good visitor experience.
46 - 55 Average Likely to provide an average visitor experience.
45 or less Poor Likely to provide a poor visitor experience.
 
continue to website presence methodology
continue to website accessibility methodology
continue to overall score methodology
 
click to go back to navigation
turning information into intelligence
turning information into intelligence